The Rate Of Malaria Parasites Co –infection Salamoella TyphO And Para- Typhi BO In Khartoum State

  • MOHANAD , E .E Department of medical parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of medical laboratory Sciences , Omdurman Islamic university.
  • Jamal , Y. L
  • Nazik M.Hassan Department of medical parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of medical laboratory Sciences , Omdurman Islamic university.
  • Abdelsalam .B,S

الملخص

Background: .

Malaria is serious vector –borne tropical diseases that remains one of the primary reasons for death in several countries . Malaria  and typhoid  co-infection is a major public health problem in many developing countries. Most of the co-infections treated are based on methods of diagnosis plagued with assumptions which possibly exaggerate the situation. Objective: This the aim of this work was to investigate the rate of co-infection with respect to the use of direct Widal test for diagnosing typhoid fever in Khartoum state .

Method: This was based descriptive cross-sectional malaria of Plasmodium falaciprum and Salamoella  . A total of 100 blood samples were collected from patients with a clinical of malaria positive and examined for malaria parasites and S. typhi infection.

Results: This study was conducted in Khartoum State between 2020 to 2021 in individual form different age groups form both male and female, out of 100 samples were positive for malaria parasites(Plasmodium falciprum) by blood films (100%) and immunochormatogrphy test 80(80%)  , 52(52%) of which were positive for salmonella typhiO and 18(18%) salmonella para-  typhi BO by the direct  Widal test.

المراجع

1. Nsutebu E, Ndumbe P. The Widal test for typhoid fever: is it useful? Africa Health. 2001; 23: 5-9.
2. Alnwich D. Meeting the malaria challenge. Africa Health. 2001; 23:18-19.
3. Edelman R, Levine M.M. Summary of an international workshop on typhoid fever. Rev,Infect Dis 1986; 8: 329-349.
4. Edet O. Another opinion on the Widal test. Africa Health. 2002; 24:2.
5. Usman A. Typhoid fever- is the Widal test useful? Africa Health. 2002; 24: 3.
6. Petit P. L. C, Wamola I. A. Typhoid fever: a review of its impact and diagnostic problems.
East Afr Med J 1994; 11: 183-188.
7. Frimpong E. H, Feglo P, Essel-Ahun M, Addy P. A. K Determination of diagnostic widal tetres in Kumasi, Ghana. West Afr J Med 2000; 19: 34-38.
8. World Health Organisation. A practical handbook on severe and complicated malaria, Geneva, 1991.
9. Akinyanju O, Grossman S. A. Leucocyte counts in healthy Nigerians. Nigerian Medical Journal 1973; 3: 95-99.
10. Raphael S. S, Spencer F. Immunology and serology. Lynch’s medical laboratory technology.Saunders, Philadelphia. 1983.
11. Mbuh F. A. Reaction of a Widal reagent in sera from suspected typhoid and non typhoid patients in Zaria. M.Sc. Thesis, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. 1997.
12. Cowan S.T. Cowan and Steel’s manual for the identification of Medical bacteria. 1981.
13. Olubuyide T. O Factors that may contribute to death from typhoid infection among Nigerians. West Afr J Med 1992; 11: 112-115.
14. Alaribe A. A, Ejezie G. C.E, Ezedinachie E. N. U. The prevalence of salmonella antibody among malaria patients in Calabar. Nigerian Journal of Parasitology(abstract) 1995;
منشور
2023-03-11
كيفية الاقتباس
, E .E, M., , Y. L, J., M.Hassan, N., & .B,S, A. (2023). The Rate Of Malaria Parasites Co –infection Salamoella TyphO And Para- Typhi BO In Khartoum State. مجلة جامعة أم درمان الإسلامية للعلوم الإسلامية والقانونية , 19(1), 182-187. https://doi.org/10.52981/oiuj.v19i1.2977