Type of High Secondary School (Governmental Vs Private) and Type of High Secondary School Certificate (Sudanese Vs Arabian): Do They Affect Learning Style?

Almuntasir  T Salah; Marwa G Alameen; Nasr  M A Elsheikh; Nazik Elmalaika O S Husain

doi:10.52981/sjms.v10i3.925

Almuntasir T Salah Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan
Marwa G Alameen Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Aneelain University, Khartoum, Sudan
Nasr M A Elsheikh Department of Prosthesis, Faculty of Dentistry, The National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan
Nazik Elmalaika O S Husain Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Omdurman Islamic University,Omdurman Sudan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52981/sjms.v10i3.925

Keywords: Learning modalities, VARK questionnaire, Unimodal preference, Medical education, Sudan

Abstract

Background: People differ in the way they perceive, process, store, and recall what they are attempting to learn. This study aimed to assess the learning styles among preclinical 1^st year medical students and the influence of the type of high secondary school (governmental vs. private) and type of high secondary school certificate (Sudanese vs. Arabian) on learning style.

Materials and Methods: A cross sectional institutional-based study was conducted at Al Neelain University, Khartoum State, Sudan. First year students of Medicine, Dentistry and Physiotherapy Faculties were enrolled. The VARK (Visual, Auditory, Read and write, and Kinesthetic) learning style hard copy questionnaire, © Copyright Version 7.8 (2014) held by VARK Learn Limited, Christchurch, New Zealand was administered following permission. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.

Results: Out of 320 students, 198 correctly completed VARK questionnaires, with mean age of 17.88 years (SD 1.52) and 74.2% were female students. About 59.6% were from governmental schools and 79.4% of the studied students had Sudanese High Secondary Certificates. About 64.1% demonstrated singular mode preference. Inferential statistics showed statistically significant difference between the learning styles and the type of secondary school whether governmental or private (P-value 0.005) while no statistically significant difference in relation to the type of high school certificate of the studied group (P-value 0.225).

Conclusion: The type of secondary school whether governmental or private may affect learning style of medical students while student's gender, type of college, or type of high school certificate (whether Sudanese or Arabian) do not. More andlarger studies are encouraged.

References

1. Ubah JN. Learning Styles among Medical Students, a Case Study of LadokeAkintola University of Technology Medical School, Osogbo, Western Nigeria, Journal of Education and Practice2012; Vol 3, No 5.
2. Bitran M et al. Medical students' change in learning styles during the course of the undergraduate program: from ‘thinking and watching’ to ‘thinking and doing’, Canadian Medical Education Journal 2012, 3(2):86-97.
3. Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Advances in Physiology Education 2006;30(1):13-6.
4. Mon AA et al. Learning style preferences among pre-clinical medical students, J Me d Allied Sci 2014; 4 (1): 22-27.
5. Prabha Vet al. Learning styles among the first year medical students, Int J Pharm Biomed Res 2013; 4(2), 135-139.
6. Slater JA et al. Does gender influence learning style preferences of first-year medical students? Advances in Physiology Education 2007;31: 336–342.
7. Baykan Z, Nacar M. Learning styles of first-year medical students attending Erciyes University in Kayseri, Turkey. Advances in physiology education. 2007;31(2):158-60.
8. Nuzhat A et al.Learning style preferences of medical students: a single-institute experience from Saudi Arabia, International Journal of Medical Education 2011; 2:70-73.
9. Guraya SS, Guraya SY, Habib FA, Khoshhal KI. Learning styles of medical students at Taibah University: Trends and implications. Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. 2014;19(12):1155-62.
10. Almigbal TH. Relationship between the learning style preferences of medical students and academic achievement. Saudi medical journal. 2015;36(3):349-55.
11. Sarabi-Asiabar A, Jafari M, Sadeghifar J, Tofighi S, Zaboli R, Peyman H, et al. The relationship between learning style preferences and gender, educational major and status in first year medical students: a survey study from iran. Iranian Red Crescent medical journal. 2015;17(1):e18250.
12. Urval RP, Kamath A, Ullal S, Shenoy AK, Shenoy N, Udupa LA. Assessment of learning styles of undergraduate medical students using the VARK questionnaire and the influence of sex and academic performance. Advances in physiology education. 2014;38(3):216-20.
13. Wehrwein EA, Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE.Gender differences in learning style preferences among undergraduate physiology students. AdvPhysiolEduc31: 153–157, 2007; doi:10.1152/advan.00060.2006.
14. Horton DM, Wiederman SD, Saint DA. Assessment outcome is weakly correlated with lecture attendance: influence of learning style and use of alternative materials. Advances in physiology education. 2012;36(2):108-15.
15. Lucchese M, Enders J, Burrone MS, Fernandez AR. A study of success predictors in the entrance examination to the school medicine (2006-2008). Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas. 2010;67(1):50-5.
16. Kumar LR, Chacko TV. Using appreciative inquiry to help students identify strategies to overcome handicaps of their learning styles. Education for health. 2012;25(3):160-4.
17. Dunne AA, Zapf S, Hamer HM, Folz BJ, Kauser G, Fischer MR. Teaching and assessment in otolaryngology and neurology: Does the timing of clinical courses matter? European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies. 2006;263(11):1023-30.
18. Hansen-Suchy K. Evaluating the effectiveness of an online medical laboratory technician program. Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology. 2011;24(1):35-40.
19. Dobson JL. A comparison between learning style preferences and sex, status, and course performance. Advances in physiology education. 2010;34(4):197-204.
20. Alghasham AA. Effect of students' learning styles on classroom performance in problem-based learning. Medical teacher. 2012;34 Suppl 1:S14-9.
21. Bhagat A, Vyas R, Singh T. Students awareness of learning styles and their perceptions to a mixed method approach for learning. International journal of applied & basic medical research. 2015;5(Suppl 1):S58-65.
22. Ghazivakili Z, Norouzi Nia R, Panahi F, Karimi M, Gholsorkhi H, Ahmadi Z. The role of critical thinking skills and learning styles of university students in their academic performance. Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism. 2014;2(3):95-102.
23. Lycke KH, Grottum P, Stromso HI. Student learning strategies, mental models and learning outcomes in problem-based and traditional curricula in medicine. Medical teacher. 2006;28(8):717-22.
24. Felder RM. Learning and teaching styels in foreign and second language education. Foreign Language Annals. 1995;28(1):21-31.
25. Williams, H. S. 1994. The differences in cumulative grade point averages among African-American freshman college learning styles: A preliminary investigation. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 8(1), 36 – 40.
26. Hattie JAC. Which Strategies Best Enhance Teaching and Learning in Higher Education? In D. Mashek& E. Hammer (Ed.), Empirical research in teaching and learning: Contributions from social psychology. Wiley-Blackwell. 2011. pp. 130-142.
27. Shukr I, Zainab R, Rana MH. Learning styles of postgraduate and undergraduate medical students. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP. 2013;23(1):25-30.
28. Suliman WA. Critical thinking and learning styles of students in conventional and accelerated programmes. International nursing review. 2006;53(1):73-9.
29. Al-Kadri HM. Improving inventory learning style. Neurosciences. 2008;13(4):426-9.
30. Jurjus RA, Krum J, Goldman EF. Design for learning: adapting the microscopic anatomy laboratory to adult learners. Anatomical sciences education. 2013;6(3):177-81.
31. Borracci RA, Arribalzaga EB. [Kolb's learning styles in medical students]. Medicina. 2015;75(2):73-80.
32. Burger PH, Scholz M. The learning type makes the difference - the interrelation of Kolb's learning styles and psychological status of preclinical medical students at the University of Erlangen. GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung. 2014;31(4):Doc42.