قاعدة المال وعلاقتها بالذرائع والحيل ومراعاة الخلاف والأمور الضرورية والحاجية إذا أكتنفها مالا يرضى شرعاً

Abstract

One of the legal evidence is clear in its relation to the other
evidence. It is also necessary to explain its relation to the
accuracy of the consideration of its limits compared to the limits
of other evidence that interfere with each other in the field and
that differed in the conventional limits. So you find some
jurisprudential issues in the construction to two or more
evidence is clear from the representation of scientists some of
the issues of some evidence and the same represent them former
than one evidence.
Its from this evidence overlapping the rule of filling excuse,
tricks. And taking into consideration the differences and issues
necessary and need and complementary and the rule of deeds.
These four rules are due in the intended origin of the
legislator to deeds rule and all those four rules due to the
prevention of evil is based on bringing interests, which is a rule
for the purposes of the rules and then the rule of filling the
excuses is to look at the judgment based on the money if the
interests leads to the corrupt and blocked. As well as the trick
and take into account the difference and the base necessary and
necessary needs and complementary as proved Elimam Elshatibi
in his book Elmowafagat approvals – it is based on the rule of
disagreement and support this relation as it is the basis of the
academic through which to deal with the realization of interests
and the prevention of evil and this relationship between the rule
of malaise acts – the relationship between this relationship is the
purpose of this research.