منهج المدرسة العقلية الحديثة في التفسير العلمي

Abstract

This research deducted the most important results and recommendations. And also this study ascertained that the Hadeeth which was confirmed by other Muslim Scholars and successive similar statements should be considered as a righteous proof in interpretation because all those relevant resources would be satisfactory. And according to divisions of the weak news, It became obvious that the weakness of the news would not be a matter of argument in interpretation unless we would witness a strong belief in interpretation.  

  1=There are three points of view according to this sort of news.

a= The view of the supporters as: El Kho’ie and El Zarakshi, who mentioned that the considerable one teller is satisfactory in interpretation.

B= The view of the opponents as: El Toosi, El Sha’arani and Mohamed Abdo who said that the single teller is not considered in the affirmation of interpretation.

C= The view of the neutralists who demanded the details as: Ayat Allah Jawadi Amli who believed that the news about the practical provisions are considered to be satisfactory. And they denied the satisfaction of convincing others in the rest of the remaining different cases.

2= We support the opinion of the details of the news of the considerable single person when the news concerns only the Qur’anic verses of provisions.

3= The researcher mentioned the most important written interpretations of the Shi’aa creed which consisted of fabricated statements and Israeli narrations, and all the cases demanded serious criticism to sift out the righteous Hadeeth and the appropriate authors. The narration in this methodology would lead us to acquire two important roles. The first role should ascertain the consolidation of the conception of the Qur’anic verses. The second role should encourage the deep conception of the Qur’anic verses through the various and different narrations which would be difficult to acquire without the sifting procedures