ECG lead misplacement by colour – What difference does it make?

Lynch R M

doi:10.52981/sjms.v9i3.1165

Lynch R M Midland Regional Hospital, Mullingar Co. Westmeath, Ireland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52981/sjms.v9i3.1165

الملخص

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and deaths from CAD are on the increase in sub-Saharan Africa. As a result the number of ECGs being recorded is increasing. Lead misplacement is associated with changes in the ECG recording, some of which can mimic significant clinical conditions. A large body of research on limb lead misplacement is available. However I have not been able to source any research on lead misplacement in which misplacement has occurred according to the colour of the leads.
Objectives: To investigate the differences in the 12-lead ECG which occur when lead misplacement by their colour has occurred.
Materials and Methods: A series of 12-lead ECGs were recorded on a healthy male volunteer. These included an ECG in which all leads were correctly attached followed by ECGs with lead misplacement based on their colour (Red: right arm – V1, Yellow: left arm – V2, Green: left leg – V3, Black: right leg – V5).
Results: The most dramatic differences occurred when the yellow leads (left arm and V2) were misplaced as well as when the green leads (left leg and V3) were misplaced.
Conclusion: It is important that those responsible for recording and interpreting ECGs are familiar with all types of lead misplacement including those in which the misplacement by the colour of the leads has occurred. A larger study should be performed to determine the consistency of these changes or the presence of others, not previously recorded.

السيرة الشخصية للمؤلف

Lynch R M، Midland Regional Hospital, Mullingar Co. Westmeath, Ireland

Consultant in Emergency Medicine

المراجع

1. Kloeck W. Acute coronary syndromes – an evolving science. Afr J Emerg Med 2013; 3: 102.
2. WHO Regional Committee for Africa. Cardiovascular diseases in the African region: current situation and perspectives-report of the regional director. Geneva, World Health Organisation, 2005.
3. Global atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control. Geneva, World Health Organisation, 2011.
4. Mocumbi AO. Lack of focus on cardiovascular disease in sub-Saharan Africa. CardiovascDiagnTher 2012; 2(1): 74-7.
5. Jamison DT, Feachen RG, Makgoba MW, Ros ER, BainganaFK, Hofman KJ, Rogo KO. Disease and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, The international bank for reconstruction and development. The World Bank, 2006.
6. Ikem I, Sumpio BE. Cardiovascular disease: the new epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa. Vascular 2011; 19(6): 301-7.
7. Lynch R. ECG interpretation: it’s easier when you know how. Dublin, Global Emergency Care Skills Publishing 2013. ISBN 978-0-9926618-0-9. 8. O’Connor RE, Brady W, Brooks SC et al. Part
10: acute coronary syndromes: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010; 122(suppl 3): S787-S817.
9. Garcia-Niebla, Garcia PL. An unusual case of electrode misplacement: left arm and V2 electrode reversal. J Electrocardiol. 2008; 41: 380-1.
10. Ullman E, Brady WJ, Perron AD, Chan T, Mattu A. Electrocardiographic manifestations of pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med 2001; 19(6): 514-9.
11. Batchvarov VN, Malik M, Camm J. Incorrect electrode cable connection during electrocardiographic recording. Europace 2007; 9: 1081-90.
12. Harrigan RA, Chan TC, Brady WJ. Electrocardiographic electrode misplacement, misconnection, and artifact. J Emerg Med 2012; 43(6): 1038-44.
13. Hoffman I. A flatline leads I results from bilateral arm to leg electrode exchange. J Electrocardiol 2008; 41: 388-90.
14. Rowlands DJ. Inadvertent interchange of electrocardiogram limb lead connections: analysis of predicted consequences. Part II: double interconnection errors. J Electrocardiol. 2012; 45: 1-6.
15. Greenfield JC, Rembert JC. Mechanisms of very low voltage waveforms in either lead I, II or III. J Electrocardiol 2009; 42: 233-4.
16. Bond RR, Finlay DD, Nugent CD et al. The effects of electrode misplacement on clinician’s interpretation of the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram. Eur J Intern Med. 2012; 23(37): 610-5.
17. Rudiger A, Hellermann JP, Mukherjee R et al. Electrocardiographic artefacts due to electrode misplacement and their frequency in different clinical settings. Am J Emerg Med. 2007; 25(2): 174-8.
18. Thaler T, Tempelmann V, Maggiorini M et al. The frequency of electrocardiographic errors due to electrode cable switches: a before and after study. J Electrocardiol 2010; 43: 676-81.
19. Haisty WK, Pahlm O, Edenbrandt et al. Recognition of electrocardiographic electrode misplacements involving the ground (right leg) electrode. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 1490.